• Home
  • Resources
  • About
  • Favorites

principleintopractice

Ramblings of an evolutionary-minded physician

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Speed Dating for Medical Students
Natural movement and thoughts on rehab »

Evolutionary Medicine 101

June 22, 2012 by principleintopractice

Last week I gave a talk on evolutionary medicine to a group of ~50 medical students at my school. I really enjoy public speaking and I love talking about evolutionary medicine, so I had a blast (and the talk seemed to be well received).  I won’t try and recount exactly what I said in my talk, but as people seem to be interested in what I had to say I’ll try and provide a general idea of how the talk flowed, sharing the things that I think medical students should keep in the back of their mind as they go through their medical training.

I started with an introduction to evolutionary medicine…

An image from a 2010 Nature article on Evolutionary Medicine. (Particularly fun as Darwin did start to train as a physician at one point!) 

The term “Evolutionary Medicine” is rather broad, and can mean anything from how and why our enzymes work a specific way to why we respond to our modern environment (or a medicine, stress, or toxin) the way we do.  It stresses (to me at least) the fact that natural selection is everywhere, and we would do well to remember this (in medicine, business, policy, and life!). The term “Evolutionary Medicine” is sometimes used interchangeably with “Darwinian Medicine”, and is often mentioned during the discussion of “Ancestral Health”. These are all terms I hope that we will hear more of as medical education continues to evolve (selection pressure is everywhere, right?)

Speaking of med schools- I just read that the first lecture new med students get at UCSD is a lecture on evolutionary medicine [1]. Very cool! I like the idea of introducing the subject to med students before the onset of clinical training, as it offers a paradigm in which to think about health and disease, instead of trying to learn everything from a purely mechanistic perspective.

As med students, we are already familiar with some selective pressures that alter human health. Microbial resistance to antibiotics, sickle cell anemia, and lactose intolerance (though perhaps more accurately, “lactase persistence”) are all things we learn about, and are probably (hopefully?) taught with an emphasis on the selection pressures that brought these things to prevalence. These three examples, however, are just the tip of the iceberg.

We can use evolutionary medicine (and indeed I think we should) at all levels of human health and disease, but I think that an excellent starting point for this discussion is to take a step back and look at the bigger picture of “what it is to be human”.

So what is “being human”?

I find the easiest way to look at this question is to ask “how does a human live ‘in the wild’”. I’m not talking about a weekend camping trip, or even a half-year adventure through the rugged arctic, but rather, what can we glean from archeological evidence, our closest hominid relatives, and native peoples about how humans evolved? Alas, many native cultures are converting (or already have converted) to a more modern lifestyle, but there is a lot that we can learn from the lifestyle of people such as the Australian Aboriginals, the New Zealand Maori, Native Americans, Kitavans, Inuit, Maasai, and others.  Even though much cultural identity has been lost in recent generations, memories and documentation exist that we can use to better understand traditionally living humans.

I should say, at the outset, that this is not a plea to return to a traditional lifestyle (nor do I think people living in traditional cultures should be barred the opportunity to adopt aspects of our modern life). This isn’t about “going back” or recreating a specific lifestyle. Instead, this is about understanding our past so we can thrive in the present (and beyond).

Perhaps first and foremost (and indeed, my starting point into evolutionary wellness (there I go using yet another term)) is the food that humans thrive on. It is increasingly evident that there is not one “perfect human diet” that we evolved to thrive on. Rather, there are a number of foods that nourish and sustain our body in a healthy way. Humans evolved eating (and indeed some of these things truly ‘made us human’) meat, seafood, eggs, vegetables, fruits, nuts, and tubers.

What about grains and dairy? This is inevitably the cry we will hear from patients, friends, family, and hospital nutritionists! To hear these people talk is to think that humans cannot exist without these two staves of life. As much as people think of these things as staples of the human diet, the reality is that they were most likely not consumed in any real quantity until the agricultural revolution, a mere 10,000 years ago (not much time when you consider the span of human evolution). While it is true some people do well on these foods (and indeed, lactase persistence gave some a significant reproductive advantage at some point in the last 10,000 years), many people do not. Even those that seem to tolerate these things well are often surprised by the benefits they experience when these things are eliminated from the diet. Not everyone does poorly on these foods, but it definitely seems that many have not evolved to thrive on them.

Perhaps more important than thinking about what humans evolved to eat is thinking about what is truly novel in our modern diet. Unnatural trans-fats (not all trans-fats, as there are natural ones such as conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), which appears to have significant health benefits) have been shown to be particularly evil, and a campaign has been waged (mostly successfully) to rid them from our modern diet. With unnatural trans-fats mostly out of the way, the worst of our modern novelties (in my opinion) is the excessive amount of linoleic acid (found in vegetable oils such as corn oil and soybean oil) in our modern diet. I could write a book about the evils of linoleic acid (who knows, maybe one day I will), but without going into detail, excess linoleic acid is associated with increased gut permeability, increased inflammation, and increased fatty liver, just to name a few conditions off the top of my head.  I think the westernized world would be a much healthier place if we would eliminate all the modern sources of linoleic acid and again embrace sources of omega-3 fats such as fatty fish and grass-fed meats (but that is enough information for another talk entirely!).

{Ed. Note- I can find it difficult to keep myself on task as I talk about evolutionary health. Since it really gives you a paradigm in which to think, it is so easy to branch off at any place to explore other venues that benefit from an evolutionary approach.}

When considering the declining health of the western world, other culprits in our modern diet are likely excessive sugars, additives and preservatives, soy, hyper-palitable processes foods, a host of other things I can’t think to list right now and, though it is debatable for some as mentioned above, grains and dairy.

Going beyond food- what else makes us human?

A topic that I have been meaning to write on for ages, but that “That Paleo Guy” Jamie Scott has recently been writing quite a bit about, is Sun.

Humans evolved outside, under the sun. Our lives, both daily and seasonally, were controlled by the rising and setting of the sun. Most of us know that UV radiation from the sun is responsible for starting the conversion of precursor compounds into active vitamin D, but how many of us actually get enough sun to be replete in vitamin D, and how much do we actually need? Looking at this from the evolutionary standpoint, we can determine that appropriate vitamin D levels are extremely important for human health and survival. Indeed- it is believed that the drive for adequate vitamin D levels is what drove lighter skin pigmentation in humans as they migrated away from the equator (lighter skin meant that people could still make adequate vitamin D despite the decreased UVB exposure at northern latitudes and the decreased skin exposure due to increased clothes in colder climates).

Vitamin D is also a great opportunity to tap into Ancestral Health as a way to guide modern medicine. For lack of a better description, we in the western world are shooting blind when trying to figure out what is an appropriate target for blood levels of vitamin D. We currently base our studies off of epidemiological studies of humans living well-outside their evolutionary niche and laboratory studies using isolated cells and models quite distant from a living, breathing, human.  While these studies can provide us with interesting information (and quite a bit of garbage), can it really give us a good idea of what is optimal for human health? Might information from people living in a traditional lifestyle give us a better idea of how humans have evolved to thrive? A paper recently came out that looked at vitamin D levels in groups of Maasai and Hadzabe and found that the mean Vitamin D concentrations in these population is 115nmol/L (~46ug/L) [2]. Whether this level is “ideal” is uncertain, but it’s an interesting (and arguably more reasonable) place to get started than trying to tease out a reasonable target from the varying levels of insufficiency in most modern civilizations.

The benefits of sunlight aren’t limited to vitamin D. The sun plays other roles in human health, and I will make a strong (personal) argument that sun exposure does wonders for psychological wellbeing!

Humans were meant to move

This is, perhaps, something that everyone can agree upon. This, like food and sun, is something that can be looked at from many different angles under the lens of evolution. How has our body evolved as we became bipeds, and where are the weaknesses in our constitution? Bipedalism changed the shape of our hips, and with it the risks of childbirth. Our shoulders are wonderfully mobile joints, but with mobility comes potential weakness (hello rotator cuff injuries!). And what about feet? Through feats (heh- couldn’t help myself!) of natural selection, our feet have been crafted over millennia to support and move us unassisted, yet now we want to rely on highly engineered shoes to cushion, balance, and protect our feet. Interesting research our of Harvard by Daniel Lieberman’s lab shows some of the effects shoes have on the forces exerted on our knees (cliff notes versions- shoes aren’t doing us any favors). Furthermore, recently the floodgates have opened letting loose a stream of research showing the “dangers of sitting”. These are all elements of human health that can be  more easily understood when placed in the context of an evolutionary paradigm.

Humans sleep

This seems like such an obvious statement, but it’s probably one of the hardest things for people to implement. As budding health professionals, we are rarely able to set a good example in this aspect, yet we should realize that cutting short on sleep is detrimental to more than just our coffee budgets. As I mentioned above, until recently, our lives were controlled by the rising and setting of the sun- now we are able to extend our hours (not just of waking, but also working), probably at great expense to our health. Here, as in other aspects of evolutionary health, I’m not recommending that we shun our modern world, but instead that we should understand our modern situation in the light of our evolutionary past and our biology. An interesting evo-health aspect to consider here is the effect of blue light on melatonin production (melatonin is a hormone important in controlling our circadian rhythm). Exposure to blue light decreases the production of melatonin in the brain, thereby affecting our sleep-wake cycle. While we’re unlikely to convince many (indeed you won’t convince me!) to turn my computer off after sunset, we should consider reasonable “hacks” to work around it. For this example, the cool free program f.lux is available, which alters the amount of blue light emitted from your display based on the time of day and your local sunset and sunrise time.  If you don’t have it already, check it out!

Humans have friends, not “friends”

I’m not going to waste much time on this one, but real, legitimate human interactions are an important part of being human. I’m not saying you can’t make great friends on the internet- one of my best friends is an internet friend- but a real social bonds take more time and effort than a 140 character message or the occasional “poke”.  Meaningful relationships take time, which is something many are painfully short of these days.  Alas, the same modern life stresses that make strong social bonds hard to forge and maintain also make such support even more necessary.

 

Evolutionary Medicine isn’t just about preventative health.

I won’t go into it here, but in the closing minutes of my talk I went on to talk about some of the evo-med examples I have written about here before. First I discussed the likely role of the appendix (and why we should care) and then I talked about an alternative perspective on the etiology of diverticulitis. I also stressed that this talk wasn’t meant to be an all inclusive “this is evolutionary medicine” talk, but more of an opportunity to introduce a subject that I hope my peers will start to consider as they continue their medical education and eventually head off to their specialty of choice.

I’ve only referenced a couple papers in this post, but I did put up a number of papers throughout my talk to show that this is science. There is a growing body of evidence to support the importance of evolutionary thinking in modern medicine, and an increasing interest in teaching evolutionary principles to medical students. As for me- I continue to find great excitement and joy (two wonderful human pleasures) in thinking about these evolutionary principles and how we can utilize them in practice.

1.            Varki, A., Nothing in medicine makes sense, except in the light of evolution. J Mol Med (Berl), 2012. 90(5): p. 481-94.

2.            Luxwolda, M.F., R.S. Kuipers, I.P. Kema, D.A. Janneke Dijck-Brouwer, and F.A. Muskiet, Traditionally living populations in East Africa have a mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration of 115 nmol/l. Br J Nutr, 2012: p. 1-5.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Evolutionary Medicine, Med school | Tagged Ancestral Health, darwinian medicine, Evolutionary Medicine, Med School, medicine, science | 12 Comments

12 Responses

  1. on June 22, 2012 at 10:33 am The Paleo Rag | Evolutionary Medicine 101

    […] Read More » Be Sociable, Share! […]


  2. on June 22, 2012 at 11:13 am jpi108

    I’m glad you talked about squatting. Med students are not so invested in the old paradigms and in their past pronouncements as their professors. So, they will be more willing to research hypotheses that make sense. There are many medical mysteries that squatting could solve.

    I hope all your fellow students (and followers around the world) have a look at http://www.naturesplatform.com/health_benefits.html and give some thought to this simple approach that Darwin would love.


    • on June 22, 2012 at 2:40 pm principleintopractice

      You might be surprised by the willingness of (at least some) physicians to hear an alternative theory. I had a discussion about diverticulitis (and the role of an anatomically inappropriate stooling position in disease pathogenesis) with a trauma surgeon and he was already aware of the idea. A resident had actually given a morning report on the theory (wish I’d known, I’d love to have gone!).

      Perhaps med students are more willing to hear a new theory to an old problem, but I’ve been surprised by how well my spiel has been received by all level of physicians (from first year interns through to heads of programs). Maybe I just have a good spiel. 🙂


      • on June 22, 2012 at 5:23 pm jpi108

        Indeed you do! Maybe I’d get a better reception if I ended my messages with a smiley face. 😀


  3. on June 22, 2012 at 10:36 pm Ken O'Neill

    Evolutionary medicine is an emerging science, albeit woefully incomplete – a situation mirroring pathetic reductionism of American medicine due to it having summarily been taken over by the reductionism inherent in agendas of pharmaceutical monopolies originating now a century ago – so pervasive are the after-effects as to impose a generally agreed upon societal ‘normal waking trance’ rather than science.

    To date, a vital component of a neo-medico-biological evolutonary science has grown up without funding by the pharmaceutical monopolies over the past 40 years, with special genomic and proteonomic expression in the past 15 years. It is noteworthy the NIH will not fund studies of this nature, perhaps even censoring findings from its database in the same manner applied to orthomolecular medicine. Over the decades, hidden away in colleges of education, in departments of physical education, the new science of exercise physiology began emerging from the 1970s. It’s aim had nothing to do with the medical-industrial-pharmaceutical complex of monopolies for whom illness is business, instead funded by alumni its business was to enable fullest genomic expression in peak performance of individual and athletic teams. The real pioneers in understanding ancestral embodiment are not the folks in evo med, rather the folks in exercise physio – understanding that ancestral Darwinian fitness meant survival and sexual selection, passing on peak performer genes that thrive, and understanding life from birth being intense struggle – not weekend warrior recreational activity.
    My blog is, to my knowledge, thus far the sole intro to the interface of evo med and exercise physio in context of Jonas Salk’s notion of the third stage of human evolution being that of Meta-Biological Evolution, Survival of the Wisest. It’s at http://www.transevolutionaryfitness.wordpress.com Don’t count it as an acolyte of the Paleo movement – it’s not/I’m not. Introduced to Darwin 56 years ago and peak performance fitness 53 years ago, I’m not easily impressed by new expression, much less so by a wake of commercialized theories constituting intellectual and practical insult to what the sciences reveal.
    I’m so utterly pleased to have found this blog! It’s great news. Let’s all work together forming a network of robust science in theory and practice, a kind of Evolutionary Translational/Integrative Medicine.

    gratefully,

    Ken O’Neill, MA, Kyoshi


    • on June 25, 2012 at 4:03 pm principleintopractice

      You’re quite a bit more cynical about the state of our modern medical situation than I am. Yes- pharmaceutical companies invest a lot of money into understanding how to treat modern diseases, but that is yet another example of natural selection in action… Our lifestyles create a niche for pharmaceutical companies, which are all too happy to develop, patent, and sell drugs to treat the end results of an inappropriate lifestyle. The pharmaceutical companies aren’t to blame- it is only natural that with such a rich niche available , pharmaceutical companies will fill the void.

      I fear that the reductionist nature of modern medicine is not a result of modern pharmaceutical company intervention, but more a result of the history and progression of medicine. The understanding of disease has progressed from miasma and humors, to an anatomical basis of disease, then a physiological (cellular) basis of disease, and now a molecular/genetic basis. Perhaps it is reductionist, but worse (in my opinion) it is almost solely mechanists- asking how, but not why. I hope (and intend to push in my writing and in my life) that the next step of medical thinking will be understanding the “why” which for almost all conditions (at some level) is best understood from an evolutionary perspective.

      It would be nice to think that exercise science is outside of the reach of the economic power of industry, but many of the studies I’ve read are funded by supplement/nutritional companies. I don’t necessarily think this is bad. Someone needs to fund research, and in our modern economic times, there is less money available for scientists working outside of industry.

      As for exercise-science people having a better grasp of ancestral embodiment that evo-med people? I can’t say I agree, as most of the exercise-phys people are not working from an evolutionary perspective, and most are pushing for a novel (evolutionary speaking) exercise goal. A lot of what I’ve seen out of exercise science research is “how best to tweak the system for peak performance” not “how to be healthy”. Peak performance is not necessarily conducive to health, and in fact is often chased at the expense of one’s health. Undoubtably, using our bodies in appropriate ways is an incredibly important aspect of being human and being healthy, but “peak performance” or even most modern measurements of “fitness” probably have little to do with “Survival of the fittest”, which is all about reproductive success.

      Thank you for stopping by my blog, and I’m glad you enjoyed it! I will make sure to give yours a look as well.


  4. on June 27, 2012 at 11:19 pm Alfred Russel Wallace

    I do love the Darwin picture with stethoscope…. He seems to have spent a lot of time worrying about the health of his children, yet he doesn’t seem to have been deeply intellectually involved in medical treatments for them, Rther he seems to have feared that they had inherited dreadful weaknesses.. I wonder what he would thinnk of your blog….


  5. on June 30, 2012 at 5:08 am Saturday: Rodeo Time! « CrossFit + Paleo = A Winning Combination

    […] Victoria presents Evolutionary Medicine 101 posted at Principle into Practice, saying, “Thoughts from an evolutionary minded med student on what other med students (and anyone interested in health) should keep in the back of their mind as they think about health and disease.” […]


  6. on July 4, 2012 at 6:32 am The Paleo Rodeo #117 | Paleo recipes

    […] presents Evolutionary Medicine 101 posted at Principle into Practice, saying, “Thoughts from an evolutionary minded med student […]


  7. on July 4, 2012 at 6:28 pm Cody Bishop

    This really is terrific and I’m very thankful for what you’re doing here. I hope our paths cross sometime in the future, perhaps at a symposium or convention.


  8. on July 4, 2012 at 6:57 pm Ken O'Neill

    I sincerely doubt that medical education offers more than cursory history of medicine, and certainly not penetrating study of the emergence of a 20th century medicine launched as corporate agendas by the Rockefellers and Carnegies. The late MIT scholar, Lily Kay, published her landmark The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology through Oxford University press in 1992 – as an Oxford publication, scholarship is impeccable beyond the pale ken of conspiracy theorists. Other works in the history of 20th century medicine, including the nefarious use of propaganda techniques to squash scientific inquiry by such highly esteemed organization as the AMA reveal a darker chapter than before the purview of the public.
    It should also be born in mind that medical education is not deeply rooted in academics so much as immersion in a mountain of facts & diagnostics pertaining to disease, scalpels and prescriptions! In short, an MD is not a PhD, while the two make for natural compliments. First semester graduate students in research degrees must master research methods and analysis in order to bolster powerful epistemological method in the face of ‘reports’. In that respect, research degrees more highly value questioning of authority than kowtowing to dogmatic acceptance.
    One of the founding figures of evolutionary medicine brought the mix of both skills to the table: Mel Konner, a world class Harvard anthropologist who in mid life took a MD at Harvard, then was recruited by Emory to head their anthropology department – his account of medical school is a priceless tale of a specific rite of passage along with penetrating questions thinking persons everywhere will value (Becoming a Doctor).
    As far as exercise physiological studies being beholding to supplement companies for funding, the folks doing genomic/proteonomic work certainly aren’t so funded, hence not evidentially biased. Those are the guys championing the necessity of activity for signalling DNA sequencing for protein turnover. There’s just no way supplement companies can prosper from research indicating the vital role of mTOR, nor the importance of regular training for production of GLUT4, the primary upstream preventative element in maintaining healthy insulin sensitivity.
    Having given a lecture last fall at a prominent medical school, I was very astonished by the fact that medical students – all real recent graduates of undergraduate biology programs – had a good sense of some genetics while utterly NO understanding of the revelations concerning genetics found in contemporary exercise physiology and their necessary role for prevention of the current pandemic of chronic degenerative diseases generally misdiagnosed as stand alone conditions, often ascribed to genes as ‘running in families’ – pure and simple embarrassing ignorance. Rather than supplement companies, I’d suggest it is the Fitness Industry itself which prefers to squash such news since the basis of training protocols and equipment would undergo revaluation as unneccessary expense.

    Meanwhile the Paleo movement, now so highly commercialized and increasingly watered down on that account, seems largely content becoming a new allopathy based on fashionable dietary practices in abstentia of a whole systems integration of activity and micronutrients favoring genetically fit expression of our nature.


  9. on July 17, 2012 at 2:00 pm We be jammin’, but less so « Neanderthal, Dark & Handsome

    […] Evolutionary Medicine 101 – Great piece! He touches on a number of issues, and brings up a wide range of concepts that I think should definitely be on them inds of medical students. “Normal” and average shouldn’t mean the same thing. The average cholesterol level of an unhealthy population isn’t likely to be the optimal level, but we tend to assume that we can push everyone towards the middle of the bell curve and make them healthier. Doesn’t really make sense when you think about it, but too few people really think about it, I fear. […]



Comments are closed.

  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Recent Posts

    • Broken Hand Tour
    • Time to heal: Round 2
    • A World Apart
    • Kiwi Wonderland
    • Cuisine Recollections
  • Archives

    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • May 2018
    • December 2017
    • April 2016
    • January 2015
    • September 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
  • Principle into Practice

    Principle into Practice
  • Categories

    • Alcohol
    • Anatomy
    • Disease
    • Evolution
    • Evolutionary Medicine
    • Food
    • General
    • Guest post
    • Historical
    • Immune System
    • Life
    • Lipids
    • Liver
    • Med school
    • medicine
    • Nature
    • New Zealand
    • Preventative Medicine
    • Principle into Practice
    • Residency
    • Science
    • Surgery
    • Travel
    • Uncategorized
  • Blogroll

    • Evolutionary Psychiatry
    • Evolvify
    • Gnolls.org
    • Hunt.Gather.Love
    • Marks Daily Apple
    • Primalmeded
    • That Paleo Guy
  • Alcohol Anatomy Disease Evolution Evolutionary Medicine Food General Guest post Historical Immune System Life Lipids Liver medicine Med school Nature New Zealand Preventative Medicine Principle into Practice Residency Science Surgery Travel Uncategorized

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • principleintopractice
    • Join 177 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • principleintopractice
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: